<< Back


Real Estate Advice

Multiple Offers: Truth or Baa Baa

Dear Pat,
I recently bought a house in the area, and paid two thousand dollars over the asking price. I know this sounds pretty normal these days, but I made the high offer without actually knowing if there were any competing offers. My agent says a new rule in the Realtors’ Code of Ethics says the listing agent can’t reveal the existence of other offers unless the seller says it’s OK. In this case the seller didn’t give consent. So I took a shot and got the house, but I’ll never know if I got fleeced. Does this sound “ethical” to you?
--Feeling Shorn

Dear Shorn,
In a word: no. I feel your pain, Shorn—you have been herded afoul of the new Standard of Practice added to the National Association of Realtors’ Code of Ethics on Jan 1, 2003, which states: Realtors, in response to inquiries from buyers or cooperating brokers, shall, with the seller’s approval, divulge the existence of offers on the property. This need for seller’s approval departs radically from our time-honored practice of always disclosing the existence of competing offers. Of course multiple offers nearly always work to the seller’s advantage, but the perception nonetheless exists that the knowledge of a competing offer might cause some buyers to avoid a potential bidding war. So a seller who believes that such disclosure actually can hurt his chances now can require that his listing agent keep mum about other offers on the table, even if asked about them.

So who does this hurt? The buyer has the opportunity to see other properties and make an offer informed by that experience to pay what he/she thinks the chosen house is worth, irrespective of any competing offers, right? Well, yes—but if that buyer is not allowed to know that others have an interest in the same property, then he/she is being denied valuable, possibly material, information about its relative value in the marketplace.

Of course it will hurt sellers, too, if by playing it close to the vest they prevent buyers from seeing how desirable their property is to others. And finally, it will

hurt listing Realtors—whose currency is their credibility—forced by poorly informed sellers to become silent liars about existing offers.

So what can be done to encourage sellers to do the right thing? Education. In 26 years I’ve brought nearly a thousand homes to market, and I can’t think of a single case where hiding buyer interest would have improved the result to the seller.

Our local Association of Realtors is asking all brokers to develop a multiple offers policy to be agreed upon with sellers at the time of listing. I’d bet nearly all educated sellers will agree to full disclosure of multiple offers, so you may end up pretty much alone in that pen of uncertainty, Shorn. At River Realty we’ve already adopted a no-fleece policy: full disclosure is the only option we offer.

 

Pat Rosaves is a full-time real estate professional living in the Seward - Longfellow area. She has more than 27 years experience in helping people with their real estate needs. Questions may be sent to her at River Realty, 2543 38th Avenue South, Mpls, MN 55406. Or call her at 612-724-1314 or email her at pat@riverrealty.net

 Reprinted from the Seward Profile and Longfellow Messenger, April 2003

---Click HERE to Print This Page---
River Realty is the most experienced Longfellow and Seward home seller. We feature Longfellow homes and Seward homes. See Homes for Sale for Longfellow houses for sale, all Longfellow real estate, Seward real estate, and South Minneapolis homes. We specialize in Longfellow, South Minneapolis, Seward, Nokomis and Southeast Minneapolis neighborhoods.